user Admin_Adham
10th Sep, 2026 12:00 AM
Test

Chemours, DuPont, Corteva Settle North Carolina 'forever Chemicals' claims For $455 Million

Sept 10 (Reuters) - Chemours, DuPont and Corteva on Thursday reached a $455 million settlement with North Carolina ⁠and 11 local entities over PFAS contamination claims tied to Chemours' Fayetteville Works plant ⁠and other historical discharges. 

Lawsuits accusing major chemical companies of polluting U.S. ⁠drinking water with toxic PFAS ‌chemicals — a group of pollutants referred to as "forever chemicals" — have led to settlements worth billions of dollars, including one struck by the three companies in New Jersey last year. 

• Payments will ‌be made over 15 years, beginning within 30 days of ​the ‌agreement's execution, and Chemours expects ‌to pay about $50 million over the next 12 months, Chemours said on Thursday.

• ⁠In line with a 2021 agreement ‌among the companies, Chemours ⁠will bear 50% ​of the settlement cost, while ‌DuPont and Corteva will split the remainder.

Article Key Points
  • Chemours, DuPont, Corteva settle NC PFAS claims for $455M.
  • Settlement tied to Fayetteville Works + historical PFAS discharges.
  • Covers NC claims excluded from 2024 U.S. public water class settlement.
  • Includes contamination from aqueous film-forming foam exposures.
  • Payments spread over 15 years; Chemours expects ~$50M next 12 months.
Dive Deeper
What health outcomes are linked to PFAS drinking-water exposure?
Which biomarkers best assess PFAS body burden?
How do PFAS exposure risks vary by water source?

• The North Carolina agreement resolves lawsuits brought by the state and local governments excluded ​from the U.S. public water system class ‌settlement ‌approved in 2024.

SUGGESTED FOR YOU

• It also covers North Carolina's claims over PFAS contamination ‌unrelated to ​Fayetteville Works, including pollution linked to aqueous film-forming foam.

• Chemours said the settlement recognizes progress under its 2019 consent ⁠order with North Carolina, including investments to cut ‌PFAS emissions and address off-site impacts.

(Reporting by Pranav Mathur in ​Bengaluru; Editing by Jonathan Ananda)

Dive Deeper


Share This Article

Comments

Leave a comment