Loading ...

user Admin_Adham
7th Sep, 2025 12:00 AM
Test

Osimertinib's Benefits in NSCLC Can Extend Beyond First Line

Data from the COMPEL trial support extending osimertinib (Tagrisso, AstraZeneca) therapy to patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first-line treatment with the drug.

In patients who experienced non-central nervous system (CNS) progression after first-line therapy, continuing the third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor alongside platinum-based chemotherapy prolonged progression-free survival by about 4 months and overall survival by about 6 months.

Overall, the combination therapy led to a 57% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death.

"These results indicate that resistance to first-line osimertinib may be heterogeneous, and some tumor cells remain sensitive to continued therapy," lead investigator Giulia Pasello, MD, PhD, medical oncologist, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padova, Italy, said in a statement

Pasello presented the findings during a press briefing on September 6 at the World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) 2025 in Barcelona, Spain.

SUGGESTED FOR YOU

Benefits Beyond First Line 

Osimertinib is a preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, offering protection against CNS progression. However, most patients eventually experience disease progression and move on to platinum-based chemotherapy, Pasello explained. 

The COMPEL trial evaluated whether continuing osimertinib following progression, when paired with chemotherapy, could extend patient survival.

Ninety-eight patients with non-CNS progression on first-line osimertinib were randomized (1:1) to receive either osimertinib 80 mg or placebo once daily. Both groups also received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC5 alongside pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles), followed by maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) until disease progression or discontinuation. 

Randomization was stratified by the presence of CNS metastases at baseline (22% in the osimertinib group and 24% in the placebo group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and secondary endpoints were CNS progression-free survival (according to CNS metastases status at baseline), non-CNS progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Overall, 96 patients received treatment — 48 in each group. Continuing osimertinib alongside chemotherapy was associated with improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43) and longer overall survival (HR, 0.71) in patients with non-CNS progression on first-line osimertinib. 

Median overall survival was 15.9 months with osimertinib vs 9.8 months without it. Median progression-free survival was 8.4 months with osimertinib vs 4.4 months with placebo. 

The 6-month overall survival rates were 67% with osimertinib plus chemotherapy and 47% with placebo plus chemotherapy, and the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 64% vs 32%, respectively.

Osimertinib plus chemotherapy was also associated with longer CNS progression-free survival in patients without CNS involvement at baseline (15.9 vs 8.6 months with placebo; HR, 0.56), adding to the established evidence supporting osimertinib's protective effect in the CNS, Pasello said. The 6-month CNS progression-free survival rates in these patients were 87% with osimertinib and 63% with placebo.

Fewer patients on osimertinib than placebo had new brain lesions during follow-up (5 vs 13 patients).

Improvement in non-CNS progression-free survival was also observed with osimertinib plus chemotherapy (8.4 vs 5.2 months; HR, 0.43), suggesting that the benefit of this combination extends beyond the CNS. The 6-month non-CNS progression-free survival rates were 65% and 35%, respectively.

New lesions were reported in 37% of patients on osimertinib vs 51% of those in the placebo arm, with fewer patients in the osimertinib group experiencing new brain lesions (10% vs 27%).

The safety findings of the osimertinib plus chemotherapy regimen were consistent with the known safety profiles for each drug. In the osimertinib group, 63% experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event and 38% experienced serious adverse events compared to 46% and 31%, respectively, in the placebo group. Overall, six patients in the osimertinib group discontinued drug treatment compared to one patient in the placebo group. 

"Results from COMPEL support continuing osimertinib as a backbone treatment for EGFRm advanced NSCLC through lines of therapy," Pasello told the briefing. 

The COMPEL study was funded by AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. No disclosure information was provided. 


Share This Article

Comments

Leave a comment